Three lil' guys gather around a standard site logo with wires coming out of it. The guys appear to be connecting the wires to something

Standard Site, launched at the beginning of this year, is a set of shared standards for publishing longform content on the internet, focused on interoperable content discovery and social features.

As the ecosystem grows — from Bluesky's link card integration to WordPress's new plugin to community reader tools emerging — more people are hearing about it and wondering:

What exactly is Standard Site, and what is it good for?

⁂ ⁂ ⁂

TL;DR what is Standard Site?

The easiest way to think about Standard Site is probably:

What if we had a way to write and follow publications on the internet, built on a large-scale social network graph?

It's a standard format for publishing and engaging with longform content on the internet (think: blogs!) in a way that's linked to your identity and easy to aggregate, built on AT Protocol.

Here's what happens when you publish something using Standard Site — a blog post in a Leaflet publication, for example:

  • a record1 for the post is published to your PDS2

  • this shows up on the public firehose3 — a source for distribution that's really easy for others to build on

  • services can crawl and index this data in different ways and do all sorts of cool things with it, like aggregate it for readers

  • all this is associated with your identity4, stable across the network

Writers: posts you publish live in a place you control. Readers: your subscriptions and recommends do too.

Per in Let’s build an Atmospheric Web, it's about enabling both ownership and distribution in the social web.

⁂ ⁂ ⁂

How is this different from RSS?

The basic problem RSS solves: given a blog (or podcast / website), what are its latest posts?

Standard Site is also about aggregating longform content on the internet. The two biggest differences are that with Standard Site, data is fundamentally associated with identity, and it's easy to index across the entire network.

With social primitives in Standard Site that don't exist in RSS, like recommends and subscribes, together with user identity, we can build up a really useful graph of social relationships around content. This makes it easy to, for example, see all the publications your friends subscribe to, or what posts they've most shared.

With the atproto firehose, we get a global distribution layer, compared to RSS where crawling and collection is more ad-hoc.

Jim also describes how atproto and RSS complement one another, and how new feed readers might enable richer social experiences, at What you can do with AT Protocol.

⁂ ⁂ ⁂

What Standard Site makes possible

Standard Site enables more flexible, composable experiences for readers and writers alike; lots of cool things are possible already:

  • Your posts and publications can be discoverable in reader tools and filterable based on your social graph

  • In an app like Leaflet, you can see all the Bluesky conversations that link to a given blog post

  • People can subscribe to publications with their atproto account, as an alternative to email — and because subs are public, you can sign into any reader app and they'll be there

Different apps can compete on different parts of the experience, and things like this become possible in Bluesky — or in any app:

Eric's avatar

Backlinks and feeds, notifications, subscriptions, additional author data, theming, link previews, profile screen integration, and more, all possible. Gonna see what the community wants first and go from there!

As Standard Site becomes more ubiquitous, we get something like RSS but with full social context, including two-way relationships between readers and publishers, as well as exciting potential for things like communities within the broader social graph.

Readers get stronger signals for discovery and more ways to enter conversations. Publishers get stronger connections to their audience and more flexibility with things like memberships. For example, we could build ways to let your Bluesky followers get exclusive access to certain content, or members-only commenting permissions.

⁂ ⁂ ⁂

How do I use Standard Site?

You can publish with — or other tools like and — to publish to Standard Site out of the box.

If you have a self-hosted static site you can use to easily publish Standard Site records, or roll your own integration.

On WordPress? Use the ATmosphere plugin or Autoblue.

There are a few layers to how you can use Standard Site — you can use all of these, or just some:

  • metadata layer: basic info like publication name, post titles, publication date, author, etc; useful for interop with various discovery and reader tools; most RSS-like

  • content layer: the actual content you're publishing, which can be in any format; not required, but putting this on protocol enables things like richer search and backlinks

  • social layer: things like subscriptions (to a publication) and recommendations (of a post), linked to your identity

To explore the ecosystem, check out:

  • reader apps like or

  • pub search to query across Standard Site posts

  • someone even made a TUI reader!

Standard Site is a great example of what AT Protocol makes possible as a technology, and what the Atmosphere makes possible as an ecosystem — a collaboratively created and stewarded set of standards leading to the emergence of lots of useful things.

It's not just a theoretical spec but a pragmatic thing that's easy to integrate, and already being widely implemented.

Play around, explore the docs, and reach out if you have questions!